- What is an easy
way, using entropy, to demonstrate that the universe is not
infinitely old.
If the universe were infinitely old, then all
usable energy in the universe would have long ago disappeared.
Since there is still usable energy in the universe, the universe is
not infinitely old.
- What is the argument using time to prove that the universe is
not infinitely old?
If the universe were infinitely old,
then in order for us to arrive at the present, an infinite amount of
time would have had to have been traversed. But, an infinity
of time cannot be traversed. Therefore, the universe cannot be
infinitely old.
- Can something bring itself into existence? Why or why
not?
If something does not exist, it has no ability to perform an
action by which it can bring itself into existence. If it exists so as to be able to perform an action, then it
already exists.
- Is it possible to have an infinite number of regressive
causes?
There cannot be an infinite regress of events because that would mean the
universe (or past universes) were infinitely old. But, this would require
an infinite amount of time to be traversed in order to
arrive at the present. This cannot happen since an
infinite amount of time cannot be traversed.
Therefore, we cannot have an infinite regression of causes?
-
Can you list two examples of the Laws of Logic?
"A" cannot be "A" and not
"A" at the same time. Something cannot bring itself into
existence.
-
What does it mean to say that the Laws of logic are transcendent?
The laws of logic are not dependent upon
the universe since they are true whether or not the universe exists. The laws of logic transcend space and time
since they are true no matter where you go in the universe and they
are true no matter when you exist in the universe.
- What is the
conclusion you can draw dealing with logical absolutes?
Since the laws of logic are conceptual,
absolute, and transcendent and since conceptual realities require a
mind, and since the conceptual realities reflect the mind thinking
them, then the mind that thinks the laws of logic is absolute and
transcendent. Therefore, there is an absolute,
transcendent mind in existence.
|